AI-generated software has changed what “unfinished” looks like.
Human-built systems usually show their missing pieces: the button does nothing, the endpoint is absent, the report is still an optimistic rectangle.
AI can produce something polished, tested, and demo-ready while hiding a much deeper gap. It looks 90% complete until the first real user discovers that the remaining 10% includes the foundations.
That changes the engineering leader’s job. Progress can no longer be judged mainly by visible features or passing tests. We need deliberate adversarial checks, real workflows, and engineers who understand enough of the system to distrust a convincing demo.
How are your teams distinguishing software that looks finished from software that can safely evolve?
Source: The Chasm: The Shape of Unfinished AI Codebases — https://jimmyhmiller.com/shape-of-unfinished-ai-codebases
#CTOThoughts #AIEngineering